Dubuque, IA (June 22, 2026) — A 36-year-old Dubuque man with a prior conviction for sexual exploitation of a minor was arrested Sunday evening on charges of failing to comply with Iowa’s sex offender registry requirements and interfering with official acts. 

According to Dubuque Police Department arrest records, Stacey Olanike Stewart (B/M/36) was taken into custody at approximately 5:49 p.m. on June 21, 2026, at 3245 Getty Terrace in Dubuque. He faces two misdemeanor charges:

1.  Failure to Comply with Sex Offender Registry (Misdemeanor)

2.  Interference with Official Acts – No Injury/Damage (Misdemeanor)

Officer E. Link set bond at $2,300. Stewart was booked into the Dubuque County Jail. 

Background on the Accused

Stewart is a registered Tier 3 sex offender in Iowa, required to register quarterly due to a 2013 conviction in Dubuque County for sexual exploitation of a minor (Iowa Code 728.12(1)). Court records indicate the offense involved a female victim aged 14-17 when Stewart was approximately 23. He has used several aliases, including Stacy O. Stewart and variations of his name. 

Public records show Stewart has had prior interactions with law enforcement in Dubuque, .

Context of Sex Offender Registry Compliance

Iowa law (Chapter 692A) mandates that registered sex offenders provide accurate, timely updates on their residence, employment, and other details to local authorities and the Iowa Department of Public Safety. Failure to comply is taken seriously due to public safety concerns. Dubuque Police conduct regular compliance checks on registrants in the city. 

Non-compliance cases often arise from unreported address changes, missed verification appointments, or other administrative lapses. The addition of an interference charge suggests Stewart may have obstructed officers during the encounter at the Getty Terrace address (part of the Sheridan Village apartment area). 

Broader Implications

This arrest highlights ongoing efforts by local law enforcement to ensure compliance among the sex offender population. Iowa’s registry aims to enhance community awareness and monitoring, though critics note challenges in enforcement and questions about long-term efficacy for rehabilitation versus recidivism risks. Stewart’s case, involving both registry failure and interference, underscores the layered accountability required of registrants. 

As of this writing, no additional details on the specific circumstances of the June 21 encounter have been released by authorities. Court proceedings are pending, and charges are accusations that have not been proven in a court of law. Presumption of innocence applies until proven guilty.

---